cocoon-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joerg Heinicke <>
Subject Re: Javaflow - major memory issue
Date Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:18:01 GMT
On 27.03.2008 04:39, Torsten Curdt wrote:

>>> Sure, here is the hierarchy from bottom to top.  At this point, I ran 
>>> the test for about five
>>> minutes (running longer would increase the percentage) and the 
>>> retained size of the one
>>> ContinuationsManagerImpl object is 58% of the total.  The 
>>> BufferedOutputStream is 50% of the
>>> total, so the other 8% is consumed by the objects in between.
>>> org.apache.cocoon.util.BufferedOutputStream
>>> secureOutputStream of  
>>> org.apache.cocoon.environment.http.HttpEnvironment
>>> env of  
>>> org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor$TreeProcessorRedirector

>>> redirector of  
>> What I was so much concerned about here was the fact of storing the 
>> whole environment in the continuation, especially since we have this 
>> non-flushing BufferedOutputStream at the end. Is there any point in 
>> storing the environment? Do we get anything useful out of it after 
>> continueing the continuation?
> What do you mean by "environment"'s not like the whole jvm is 
> stored but only the flow. External resources should be injected (vs 
> stored) as much as possible.

Just have a look at the quote from the original. It gives the object 
relationships in the memory. BufferedOutputStream takes 50% and is hold 
in HttpEnvironment which is hold in TreeProcessorRedirector which is 
hold in ContinuationContext. I wondered why it is there.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message