Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73224 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2007 09:29:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Dec 2007 09:29:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 79808 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2007 09:29:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 79652 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2007 09:29:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 79640 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2007 09:29:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:29:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:29:01 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1J4Ykv-0003VZ-4b for users@cocoon.apache.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:28:53 -0800 Message-ID: <14387674.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:28:53 -0800 (PST) From: "angel.of.cynicism" To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Posting html forms In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: the.merciful.angel.of.cynicism@gmail.com References: <313b44180712130657sf0f0b32x1112b6a619a1b5af@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org solprovider-2 wrote: > > While I love writing Java and have written Cocoon Generators, I believe > only new standard components should require programming Java with Cocoon. > When you say 'new standard components' thats for the website I am developing? Based on the nature of the site I cannot see us getting away from writing java code, each business transaction communicates to web-service. Would inheriting off the ServiceableAction for request handling be a valid consideration? solprovider-2 wrote: > > The previous developer was not using Cocoon well. > Indeed, this was blatantly obvious after 5 minutes...was not even using Java well. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Posting-html-forms-tp14324948p14387674.html Sent from the Cocoon - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org