Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: integrating wicket and cocoon
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:00:44 +0200
Message-ID: <A955EA1F8FE31749AEC8C998082F6C7C011D87E2@webmail.hippo.nl>
Thread-Topic: integrating wicket and cocoon
Thread-Index: Acegn6uiqJPybCiDRlSUbodJeiHT5ABL5yKg
From: "Martijn C. Vos" <m.vos@hippo.nl>
To: <users@cocoon.apache.org>


Grzegorz Kossakowski [mailto:gkossakowski@apache.org] wrote:
>  Luca Marrocco pisze:
>  > i have a trip in my mind. I want using wicket inside cocoon.
>  >=20
>  > a brief regression on cocoon wicket integration interest.. i'm a
>  > professional free software agile developer. My software factory use
>  > only free software or open source software for all development,
>  > testing and production stack. Our application is essentially based
>  > over cocoon (2.1.9) using a custom framework (around cform and
>  > flowscript, you anyone know was it) for controller development and
>  > client side interface. During this day we have interested to
>  > substitute cform (that is quite noise to development) and i want
>  > introduce the using of wicket instead it ;)
> =20
>  Would you like to explain us why you want to integrate=20
>  Wicket? What are the benefits?

The benefits are pretty obvious to me. Wicket seems to be very good
at everything Cocoon is bad at and vice versa. I would love to
replace the terribly slow CForms with something more like Wicket.


mcv.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org