Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4179 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2006 04:53:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 2006 04:53:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 29944 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2006 04:52:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29769 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2006 04:52:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29758 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2006 04:52:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:52:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of tcurdt@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.185] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:52:54 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so573916nfb for ; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:52:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=uh6f55yEyiwdBeZCYTl2o9kPpRIf54FF79KNGg++ZiGQXo6NnHi8bq6nkiO+6qxLKoFzHHBdwSJOvwMmU/3h4ubzI+lJxEPjhVFoK5a+KY28rsWUO3I6iPZAOYtqF9F6D4rbnztTl02eKXXtKxKyIGKvM/p6j7fOXplPt6PblnQ= Received: by 10.78.139.5 with SMTP id m5mr154082hud; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.178.14 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98e4f1cd0608012152i2425c46y3652e238524bcb10@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:52:32 +1000 From: "Torsten Curdt" Sender: tcurdt@gmail.com To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Flow concurrency (was Re: Action Vs Logicsheet) In-Reply-To: <1c3501c9c898891d0a3e7e82d22470b0@wrinkledog.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1c3501c9c898891d0a3e7e82d22470b0@wrinkledog.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3162e2a9aef0058f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > >> You're saying that flow calls in concurrently received requests within > >> a session are processed serially, not in parallel threads? Is that > >> right? > > > > That's pretty much it in a nutshell, yes. > > wow... Not sure if that's really such a big thing (how many concurrent requests to the flow engine do you expect a user to make. Quick fingers! ;-) > Is there a developer around who can confirm/refute the above? For javaflow this should not be true. cheers -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org