Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4940 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2005 15:34:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2005 15:34:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 3208 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2005 15:34:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 3187 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2005 15:34:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 3167 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2005 15:34:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:34:09 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jckermagoret@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.198] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:34:02 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r28so412149nza for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:33:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=K77TMCY1S2n6OJFx1yKgX5ffHDLYF5EM9MPAsVojxIMBLeVwTRRyD69OMUlMLj6r1uN3GEtwrZ0Ls5bt10OFAidDEZCN+NbHx9jCeBg/rthbBbkXOpuYDaEBj9e+RTwiL0S2KU5saMaiSbA4tYJ8PZXuwOeFnsOY3jLKzfDDWTk= Received: by 10.65.197.18 with SMTP id z18mr963568qbp; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:33:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.44.11 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:33:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <67aba8b70511100733o3681ac35m@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:33:48 +0100 From: Jean-Christophe Kermagoret To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Where is the frame.xsl for the cocoon portal ? In-Reply-To: <437365A4.9080708@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16864_17918378.1131636828019" References: <67aba8b70511100646m9197498u@mail.gmail.com> <43735ED4.4050500@apache.org> <67aba8b70511100704h1c8ad6b1k@mail.gmail.com> <437365A4.9080708@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_16864_17918378.1131636828019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline It sounds very interesting I'm using 2.1.8-dev, are the modifications related to AJAX are compatible with the 2.1.8 version ? Jean-Christophe 2005/11/10, Carsten Ziegeler : > > Jean-Christophe Kermagoret wrote: > > Waouuuuhhhhhh > > > > Thanks for this quick reply :-) > > > > I'm interested to try this layout to compare the costs between (one > > coplet update) and (one coplet update + reload of the rest of the > portal). > > > > Do you think it's worth the case ? > > > > Do you know if somebody already worked on this ? The idea is to build a > > AJAX layout to minimize reloading if it permits to spare cpu cycles and > > networkbandwith > > > > WDYT ? > > > Have a look at the portal in Cocoon trunk :) Especially at the Gallery > demo - for minimizing/maximizing and some updates of coplets, the > refresh is done using ajax and only the affected coplet is transfered > from the server to the client. > The work is not finished yet which means there are still cases where > Ajax is not used but could be used. But in general I think it's worth to > think about this. > > Carsten > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG > http://www.s-und-n.de > http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org > > ------=_Part_16864_17918378.1131636828019 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline It sounds very interesting

I'm using 2.1.8-dev, are the modifications related to AJAX are compatible w= ith the 2.1.8 version ?

Jean-Christophe

2005/11/10, Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>: Jean-Christophe Kermagoret wrote:
> Waouuuuhhhhhh
>
> Tha= nks for this quick reply :-)
>
> I'm interested to try this lay= out to compare the costs between (one
> coplet update) and (one cople= t update + reload of the rest of the portal).
>
> Do you think it's worth the case ?
>
> Do you = know if somebody already worked on this ? The idea is to build a
> AJ= AX layout to minimize reloading if it permits to spare cpu cycles and
> networkbandwith
>
> WDYT ?
>
Have a look at the p= ortal in Cocoon trunk :) Especially at the Gallery
demo - for minimizing= /maximizing and some updates of coplets, the
refresh is done using ajax = and only the affected coplet is transfered
from the server to the client.
The work is not finished yet which me= ans there are still cases where
Ajax is not used but could be used. But = in general I think it's worth to
think about this.

Carsten

--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

-------= --------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands,= e-mail: users-help@cocoon.= apache.org


------=_Part_16864_17918378.1131636828019--