Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85904 invoked from network); 12 May 2005 14:57:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2005 14:57:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 30144 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2005 15:01:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 30088 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2005 15:01:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 30066 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2005 15:01:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of jonnybecker@gmx.net designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender) Received: from pop.gmx.net (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 12 May 2005 08:01:04 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 May 2005 14:56:51 -0000 Received: from p549A3C5A.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.102]) [84.154.60.90] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 12 May 2005 16:56:51 +0200 X-Authenticated: #22981904 Message-ID: <42836EA9.1060309@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:56:41 +0200 From: Johannes Becker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: flow question - Is there some function like System.out.println("xxx"); References: <5E091A68F794974CAF431CA31F5AF2CC1DA5AD@server.bizzdesign.nl> In-Reply-To: <5E091A68F794974CAF431CA31F5AF2CC1DA5AD@server.bizzdesign.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, sorry for keeping you guys busy. Was my mistake. Tried the Packages.xxx in a function I didn't call. It also works for me (now) of course. Sorry again. Thanks Jonny Bart Molenkamp wrote: >>I didn' know there was a difference between "Packages.java.xxx" and >>"java.xxx". >> >> >> > >As far as I know, there is no difference. Using Packages... is always >required, except for classes under the java package. See >http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/flow/java.html > >for more info. > >Bart. > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org