Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Message-ID: <4228354C.3090302@notremanou.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:15:40 +0700
From: Marc Salvetti <marc@notremanou.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: <cinclude:cached-include src="cocoon:/foo/bar.xml"
 select="/foo/*"
 />
References: <42282CF0.9080703@juwimm.com>
In-Reply-To: <42282CF0.9080703@juwimm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

personnaly, i checked for performance reasons (include of about 300 
small xml files) 3 differents include method :
-cinclude
-xinclude
-function document inside xsl

my choice was finally the document function (under 1s against 2-4s for 
the transformers)

hope this helps :)

btw, once in a while, the server takes a few seconds to answer on this 
request (i guess it's cleaning the cache, but i don't really know). Does 
someone have an idea on how to fix this ?

cheers
Marc

Michael Frankfurter a �crit :

> hi there,
>
> i started playing around with the CIncludeTransformer an it's quite 
> cool, but there is a thing i don't understand:
>
> why isn't it possible to use "cached-include" and the attribute 
> "select" together? i took a look at the source and it is hard-coded to 
> ignore the attribute:
>
> cinclude:cached-include
>
> this.processCIncludeElement(
>     attr.getValue("",CINCLUDE_INCLUDE_ELEMENT_SRC_ATTRIBUTE),
>     null,
> -->    null,
>     null,
>     null,
>     this.cacheManager != null);
>
> cinclude:include
>
> this.processCIncludeElement(
>     attr.getValue("",CINCLUDE_INCLUDE_ELEMENT_SRC_ATTRIBUTE),
>     attr.getValue("",CINCLUDE_INCLUDE_ELEMENT_ELEMENT_ATTRIBUTE),
> -->    attr.getValue("",CINCLUDE_INCLUDE_ELEMENT_SELECT_ATTRIBUTE),
>     attr.getValue("",CINCLUDE_INCLUDE_ELEMENT_NS_ATTRIBUTE),
>     attr.getValue("",CINCLUDE_INCLUDE_ELEMENT_PREFIX_ATTRIBUTE),
>         false);
>
> why is it implemented in that way? or is there a way to mix it up?
>
> i would use xinclude instead of cinclude but this isn't cacheable 
> either :o(
>
> thanks,
> micha f.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org