Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73574 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2005 19:53:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2005 19:53:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 37843 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2005 19:53:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 37804 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2005 19:53:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 37789 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2005 19:53:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (HELO smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 11:53:01 -0800 Received: from [10.0.0.152] (daigeert.xs4all.nl [80.127.22.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j22JqqIL046136 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:52:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Geert.Josten@daidalos.nl) Message-ID: <42261994.7050501@daidalos.nl> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:52:52 +0100 From: Geert Josten Organization: Daidalos BV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: "Attempted to process incomplete pipeline" error? References: <5701F19C-8B37-11D9-9A03-000A95D6B56C@comcast.net> <4225FA3B.2000701@sil.org> <85848F6E-8B49-11D9-9A03-000A95D6B56C@wrinkledog.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > You're right in that there's no SAX events to serialize. However, I > wonder if adding a serializer would quiet Cocoon's complaints of an > incomplete pipeline? I believe that's what Lars was getting at. No, the sitemap parser will complain that it is not legal to combine a redirect-to with a serialize > Of course, the real solution to your problem is to do all your > redirecting from flowscript. ;) No need to use flowscript, could do a generate and serialize as well, though there is a difference: a redirect-to is visible in the browser. Streaming with generate/serialize or flowscript not. Cheers --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org