Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43212 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2005 12:53:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 12:53:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 74828 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2005 12:52:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 74778 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2005 12:52:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 74763 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2005 12:52:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_40_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of orosmith@sify.com designates 202.144.76.20 as permitted sender) Received: from sifyr2.maa.sify.net (HELO sifyr2.maa.sify.net) (202.144.76.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 04:52:48 -0800 Received: (sifymail 9922 invoked by uid 5012); 7 Mar 2005 18:04:14 +0530 Received: from 202.144.76.20 (HELO SifyMail1.1) (202.144.76.20) by 202.144.76.20 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 18:04:14 +0530 Received: (sifymail 19004 invoked from 202.144.76.18 by host smwp01 by uid 7002); 7 Mar 2005 18:04:15 +0530 Received: from 202.144.76.18 (HELO SifyMail1.0) (202.144.76.18) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 18:04:15 +0530 Received: (sifymail 19001 invoked from 210.210.123.176 by host smwp01 by uid 99); 7 Mar 2005 18:04:15 +0530 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=portal; d=sify.com; b=cConAHnuKAA/3Eiovece0CKXm2DI/SGNWSYdGCjPhAvQPI6Jd7KNH5ZG/B41YtPq ; To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: wml doctype Message-ID: <1110198854.422c4a46ccb1f@smwp01.maa.sify.net> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:04:14 +0600 (IST) From: Adriano Smith MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-MOQ1110198854c7fb3ab353e6304dde4b83d04a8de766" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ---MOQ1110198854c7fb3ab353e6304dde4b83d04a8de766 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit is it compulsory to have the doctype and xml version for a wml page? if i try to ignore the above declaration in the wml page and validate the wml in a wml validator there is no error. However an error occurs if i include the above lines in the wml code. So i ignored the doctype and version declaration by commenting the lines on the sitemap and tested the wml page on the pda, the page doesnt load though. Can anyone please help me and tell me as to y this happens and can i ignore the declaration?? thanks ---MOQ1110198854c7fb3ab353e6304dde4b83d04a8de766 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

is it compulsory to have the doctype and xml version for a wml
page?


WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">

if i try to
ignore the above declaration in the wml page and validate the wml in a
wml validator there is no error. However an error occurs if i include
the above lines in the wml code.

So i ignored the doctype and version
declaration by commenting the lines on the sitemap and tested the wml
page on the pda, the page doesnt load though.

Can anyone please help
me and tell me as to y this happens and can i ignore the
declaration??

thanks

---MOQ1110198854c7fb3ab353e6304dde4b83d04a8de766--