Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3188 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2005 17:59:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2005 17:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 32585 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2005 17:59:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 31638 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2005 17:59:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 31623 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2005 17:59:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of ap-cocoon-users@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:59:51 -0800 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1D5Sd3-0004lY-T2 for users@cocoon.apache.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:54:53 +0100 Received: from d51a4ce66.access.telenet.be ([81.164.206.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:54:53 +0100 Received: from jh by d51a4ce66.access.telenet.be with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:54:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: users@cocoon.apache.org From: Jorg Heymans Subject: Re: [cforms] Partial Binding Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:58:08 +0100 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <01e95dc84079f0c6ea4bf5931917d612@yahoo.com> <000601c51ceb$352e3480$1d16cfdc@sony> <12eef5759fe64cf3359865a7ee5edb89@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: d51a4ce66.access.telenet.be User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <12eef5759fe64cf3359865a7ee5edb89@yahoo.com> Sender: news X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: ap-cocoon-users@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: users@cocoon.apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Alex Romayev wrote: > If I understand you correctly, then I'd need to look through the "form" > beans, match them with the actual beans and the the values. Sort of > defeats the purpose of using the binding in the first place? > Why ? I find it good practice to have form beans as an extra layer between the real "business" beans and the user. Jorg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org