Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of benanderson.us@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.195 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=ksRdZyi3W1pr9gMI1ZYBtoG7WmxA4m26zILF4NWHEDTeOCEcnxdEe1aehGbWs144w/0lB4INKY7YoSHTBUJWs5Y7mtZcP+oUDIGYyAx2T2EclxrkezIRTJcZVWloCK06MRzNN9ghE3/kVuVU9SLHVVy2y1iR3ATpPDSWM6xFido=
Message-ID: <fc85d70405011304461fe208e0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:46:30 -0500
From: Ben Anderson <benanderson.us@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Ben Anderson <benanderson.us@gmail.com>
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Business-Process-Management with Cocoon?
In-Reply-To: <41E58500.2080605@form4.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <41D7F475.1080900@asspaxx.de> <41E58500.2080605@form4.de>

we've actually been evaluating open source workflow engines.  I
focused on osworkflow for a while and was rather indifferent about it
and have now (just the last day) started investigating enhydra shark. 
So far, it seems to be the best, but I haven't played with it too much
yet.
-Ben


On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:13:52 +0100, oliver charlet
<oliver.charlet@form4.de> wrote:
> Hi Markus,
> 
> it is a late answer, but if you did not yet make up your mind about an
> BPM Tool - this is a very serious desicion to do - , go to
> http://www.jbpm.org and check the extensive sources about the subject.
> Although the site is about one solution, that is more and more mentioned
> as to be the most promissing, I suggest, that you follow some of the
> discussions you can find there under
> http://www.jbpm.org/state.of.workflow.html. Check the links at the end
> of this article to get more opinions.
> For me the most important conclusion is, that it is important to
> understand, that there is *NO* standard BPM language at the moment. Most
> of the existing (XML) languages
> are not really sufficiant enough to be a real standard.
> 
> good look,
> :olli
> 
> Markus Heussen schrieb:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > Can anybody point me to Open Source BPM Systems using comfortable user
> > (web-) interfaces to design business processes in standard BPL. In a
> > new project starting next week we need such a tool to define our
> > business processes consisting off several Web Service calls.
> >
> > One tool I found is Twister. For informations about it look at
> > http://www.smartcomps.org/twister/.
> >
> > Does anybody have experiences in BPMS and can link me to free
> > alternatives. Maybe there exists a Cocoon based BPM System? Last we
> > would prefer because we started using Cocoon about 2 years ago.
> >
> > Thanks for any hint!
> >
> > Markus
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org