Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93673 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2004 21:29:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2004 21:29:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 83978 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2004 21:28:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 83941 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2004 21:28:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 83925 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2004 21:28:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.87.17.19] (HELO netlx050.vf.utwente.nl) (192.87.17.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:28:56 -0800 Received: from ws (bodylotion.student.utwente.nl [130.89.166.226]) by netlx050.vf.utwente.nl (8.11.7/HKD) with ESMTP id iAGLSea02372 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:28:43 +0100 From: Emond Papegaaij To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem with cForms and validation Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:28:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200411152110.07736.e.papegaaij@student.utwente.nl> <1100591242.32451.79.camel@yum.site> In-Reply-To: <1100591242.32451.79.camel@yum.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411162228.40286.e.papegaaij@student.utwente.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: e.papegaaij@student.utwente.nl X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tuesday 16 November 2004 08:47, Bruno Dumon wrote: > Try moving the fd:validation tags out of fd:datatype (so that they are > siblings of fd:datatype). The validation has been refactored from > datatype validators to more general widget validators, and the > compatibility to support the old syntax seems to be broken. Thanks! This works like a charm. This new way of validation is the way it is going to be and the old one will be deprecated? Best regards, Emond Papegaaij --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org