Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27468 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2004 11:22:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2004 11:22:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 64157 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2004 11:22:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 64008 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2004 11:22:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 63993 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2004 11:22:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.145.81.85] (HELO mail.link77.net) (208.145.81.85) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 04:22:22 -0700 X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/ClamAV http://raeinternet.com/mpp Received: from [4.226.30.169] (account lars_huttar@mail.jaars.org HELO dnshuttar) by mail.link77.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 48287430 for users@cocoon.apache.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:27:50 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Lars Huttar" To: Subject: RE: Fundamental Cocoon Philosophy Question Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 06:22:15 -0500 Message-ID: <009d01c49a4d$17057750$4c1ee204@dallas.sil.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Lars > > What you say is true up to a point. But most people will > try out a new product on a *small* scale first before > making a large commitment (a bit like engagement > before marriage). I do not believe that the community > has to "demonstrate" that the product works - its up to > each person to satisfy themselves that Cocoon will work > for their situation. Having useful samples does help a lot > in this regard... and obviously being willing to answer any > serious questions, where possible. Ultimately, though, > we cannot "prove" that Cocoon is ideal or a perfect fit > for someone else's situation. Agreed (with regard to Cocoon. I'm not sure how far you meant the engagement analogy to go. :-) > Perhaps I should have phrased my last remark to say: > "Cocoon works well for me because, in addition to the > valuable technology it contains, its also supported by > a strong community." Other products may also have > this but I can only speak from my own experience... > > Derek --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org