cocoon-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gerald Aichholzer" <>
Subject Re: Should static files be cached serverside?
Date Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:56:12 GMT
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:34:10 -0700 (PDT), Ralph Goers  
<> wrote:

> Gerald Aichholzer said:
>> On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:26:32 +0200, Jorg Heymans <> wrote:
>>> or you could just let apache serve your static html.
>> are there any samples doing this? the wiki docs still say "todo".
>> I'm using cocoon under windows (it's for a prototype only) and
>> have tried to serve static files (mostly images) with TinyWeb
>> (which is a very small web server for windows). My application
>> slowed down by a factor of 3-4.
>> If apache shows the same behaviour then I don't see any advantages.
> You have an apache web server at port 80. The static content is there and
> apache serves that up.  Configure apache to proxy the requests for
> non-static content to tomcat/jetty for cocoon to process.

Thanx for your answer - unfortunately I don't know much about
configuring apache.

Well, by clicking on a href="/miracle/app/cook/info.gif" in my
xhtml-source-code my browser connects to the following address:


But if I want to serve static content with apache, it should be


Do I have to modify my generated xhtml-code to achieve this or
do I have to edit apache's configuration file only?

Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message