Return-Path: 
 <users-return-67067-apmail-cocoon-users-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 80949 invoked from network); 4 May 2004 21:30:24 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2004 21:30:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 41678 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2004 21:30:01 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 41640 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2004 21:30:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:users-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 41626 invoked from network); 4 May 2004 21:30:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO warden.diginsite.com) (208.29.163.248)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2004 21:30:00 -0000
Received: from wlvims01.diginsite.com by warden.diginsite.com
          via smtpd (for daedalus.apache.org [208.185.179.12]) with SMTP;
 Tue, 4 May 2004 14:29:57 -0700
Received: from WLVIMS01 ([127.0.0.1]) by WLVIMS01.digitalinsight.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35)
          with SMTP id com for <users@cocoon.apache.org>;
          Tue, 4 May 2004 14:29:56 -0700
Received: by calexc01.diginsite.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
	id <K1GADP7B>; Tue, 4 May 2004 14:28:47 -0700
Message-ID: <31DF72A980E5D511B48C000102BD8685061DB3AD@calexc01.diginsite.com>
From: Ralph Goers <Ralph.Goers@digitalinsight.com>
To: "'users@cocoon.apache.org'" <users@cocoon.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Vote: to unify, or not to unify - results
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 14:28:43 -0700 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

I'm confused by your statement. Did you mean that xsp/esql is perfect in
most cases for you (and your product website), or that you feel it is the
"best" way to perform an SQL query and that it should be recommended to
everyone? 

Ralph

-----Original Message-----
From: gounis@osmosis.gr [mailto:gounis@osmosis.gr] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 2:14 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Vote: to unify, or not to unify - results
let me put here  my two cents

for select queries xsp/esql is great and the perfect _in_most_cases_ way
in most cases we create pipelines that make select queries and return the 
content in xml format. then we call this pipelines in most cases internal.


--stavros



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org