Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55180 invoked from network); 11 May 2004 11:07:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 11 May 2004 11:07:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 48678 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2004 11:08:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 48599 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2004 11:08:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 48580 invoked by uid 98); 11 May 2004 11:08:14 -0000 Received: from bruno@outerthought.org by hermes.apache.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamuko: 0.70. Clear:RC:0(157.193.121.51):. Processed in 0.235957 secs); 11 May 2004 11:08:14 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: bruno@outerthought.org via hermes.apache.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(157.193.121.51):. Processed in 0.235957 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO otsrv1.iic.ugent.be) (157.193.121.51) by hermes.apache.org with SMTP; 11 May 2004 11:08:13 -0000 Received: from 192.168.123.100 (host100 [192.168.123.100]) by otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4BB75O11803 for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 13:07:05 +0200 Subject: Re: is it a cform field widget bug? From: Bruno Dumon To: users@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: <008a01c4373b$755269f0$610aa8c0@sony> References: <006a01c4372b$e798d1d0$610aa8c0@sony> <40A08853.8060204@outerthought.org> <008a01c4373b$755269f0$610aa8c0@sony> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Outerthought Message-Id: <1084273559.18984.9.camel@23.13 yum.ot yum Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 13:06:17 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 11:36, Johnson wrote: > change to ? the same This should work. Make sure you're editing the correct file, and that you begin a new flow (if unsure, restart servlet container). > change to ? the both option value change to "" of course, where do you got that from? > > Best Regards > > Johnson Hsu > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marc Portier" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 4:01 PM > Subject: Re: is it a cform field widget bug? > > > > > > > > Johnson wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I use field widget to represent a boolean field , like below > > > > > > > > > dc: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > single > > > > > > > > ^^^^ > > > > you might want to try with 'true' in stead > > > > -marc= > > > > > double > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when I run the form,the source is below. > > > > > > > > > > > > both the value is false! > > > > > > is it a bug? > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > Johnson Hsu > > > > > > -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center bruno@outerthought.org bruno@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org