Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Message-ID: <40683BDE.1070704@upaya.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:08:14 +0100
From: Upayavira <uv@upaya.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Woody version 1 or 2 ?
References: <200403291317.55071.peter@easyspeedy.com>
 <32888.10.0.0.5.1080571934.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <32888.10.0.0.5.1080571934.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Antonio Gallardo wrote:

>Woody is being deprcated in favor of CForms. Use better CForms.
>  
>
Yes, but you still have the Form.js vs v2/Form.js question, don't you?

My uneducated answer would be that Form.js is much more tried and tested 
- v2 is a proposal that I have recently started seeing people use.

For safety, go with Form.js. For potentially greater flexibility (I 
guess) go with v2/Form.js.

Given that cforms are still much under development, there's no 
definitive answer to this. You have to use your own judgement, really.

Regards, Upayavira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org