Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10517 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 01:52:52 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 01:52:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 65284 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2004 01:52:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 65250 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2004 01:52:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 65229 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 01:52:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sharpei.wrinkledog.com) (65.243.176.122) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 01:52:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 13068 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 01:54:04 -0000 Received: from c-67-171-181-164.client.comcast.net (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (ml@67.171.181.164) by xerox-servicesales.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 01:54:04 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed To: users@cocoon.apache.org From: Mark Lundquist Subject: Sitemap style question Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:52:24 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Dear Cocoon experts, OK, my application has several different facets, but I'm not using=20 sub-sitemaps for these... (maybe I should, at that =97=A0but for now = it's=20 easier to keep track of things in just the one sitemap, I guess; also,=20= it saves me from having to do more planning of the URI space than maybe=20= I want to right now). So... each "facet" or aspect of the app could have its own=20 externally-accessible pipeline and its own internal-only pipeline to=20 support it ("Way 1"). This way, I might end up with like 10 pipelines. Or ("Way 2"), I can have one big externally-accessible pipeline,=20 divided up (notionally) into sections for each facet... and one big=20 internal-only pipeline, similarly divided up. "Way 1" seems over-engineered. "Way 2" seems like 'bad cohesion'. What would you do? Thanks, ~ml --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org