Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19204 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2003 10:13:43 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Dec 2003 10:13:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 4536 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2003 10:13:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 4239 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2003 10:13:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 4226 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2003 10:13:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.xs4all.be) (195.144.64.135) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Dec 2003 10:13:08 -0000 Received: from outerthought.org (195-144-088-010.dyn.adsl.xs4all.be [195.144.88.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.xs4all.be (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBGADL8k017941 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:13:21 +0100 Message-ID: <3FDEDAC0.4090002@outerthought.org> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:13:20 +0100 From: Marc Portier Organization: Outerthought User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [Woody-binding] nested repeaters are allowed? References: <40296.10.0.0.5.1071568080.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> In-Reply-To: <40296.10.0.0.5.1071568080.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Antonio Gallardo wrote: > Hi: > > Is posible to nest repeaters in the binding of a Java Bean? > > I am facing a database structure of type master(detailA[detailB]). I need > to present it as: > > master (detail A) (detail B) so in order to do that, I need to nest the > repeaters. > > Is this posible at all? > good question! I've recently seen nested repeaters in template (building rows and columns) and definition and they seemed to work :-) in any case I see no conceptual reason (yet) why it should not work for the binding also of course if you have the first test case it might show some implementation bugs which I'll hapily look into just go for it and keep us posted? regards, -marc= > Best Regards, > > Antonio Gallardo. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org > -- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/ mpo@outerthought.org mpo@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org