Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1530 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2003 14:17:27 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2003 14:17:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 53796 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2003 14:17:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 53780 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2003 14:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 53767 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2003 14:17:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO email01.aon.at) (195.3.96.97) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2003 14:17:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 376186 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2003 13:55:21 -0000 Received: from n601p023.dipool.highway.telekom.at (HELO gmx.at) ([212.183.85.23]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail1rs.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2003 13:55:21 -0000 Message-ID: <3FABA448.2090103@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 14:55:20 +0100 From: Alexander Schatten User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: de-at, en-gb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Compilation of Cocoon / Binary Distribution / Different Configurations, References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicolas Toper wrote: >for instance I know tons of webdeveloper with no formal training and admin >sys competencies. They use EasyPHP (a great product by the way) to develop >their websites. Why? B/C it's easy to install on windows and for now >definitely easier than Cocoon. > > > (1) yes, this is an important issue. Cocoon < 2 was extremly difficult to install; so what I did then for my courses was to bundle a tomcat/cocoon installation for my customers to download, because otherwise, they would never have used Cocoon (2) then I was so happy about the 2.0 release, because installation meant to get the binary distribution and copy the war file into the tomcat webapps directory (also binary distribution available). Although an even better solution would have been to bundle tomcat/jetty with Cocoon. simple unzip and start. (3) Now we have the exasperating source distribution/compilation problem that in result is an excellent measurement to avoid new Cocoon users (particularly when they are no Java developers): If a new user-non Java developer reads, that he has to install the JVM and compile Cocoon before usage, he will switch to PHP or something else. (4a) Even worse: there are some details that are very confusing for new users: e.g. the "cocoon-latest-..." naming on the download. Even I was stumbeling, because I though, this might be some developer snapshot, some unstable release and I was searching for some release; and after I found no "2.x" marked release I used this one. (4b) References to cvs are *completley* useless for non-experts. No "newbie user" who is not programmer will do this, particularly under windows, where you have no cvs clients installed. So most probably the new distribution strategy is a clear and solid step backward. To concluce: if the Cocoon Community is interested in non-Java-expert-Cocoon users, there is to provide a binary installation that has to be downloaded, unpacked and startet. this is at least my opinion. Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org