Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49912 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2003 19:08:07 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 2003 19:08:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 7620 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2003 19:07:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 7573 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2003 19:07:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 7525 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2003 19:07:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out001.verizon.net) (206.46.170.140) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 2003 19:07:29 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([4.40.114.87]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030925190734.SODE5382.out001.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:07:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3F733CF0.8090705@verizon.net> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:07:28 -0700 From: Christopher Oliver User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Flowscript problem? References: <000b01c38377$bee34c60$9b506bc2@WRPO> <3F73280A.5010505@verizon.net> <3F733937.6040305@anyware-tech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [4.40.114.87] at Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:07:34 -0500 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Christopher Oliver wrote: > >> Reinhard, >> >> Local variables are _shared_ between continuations. Changes to the >> value of the variable in one continuation should be visible to >> another. If that is not the case, there's a bug. > > > > Do you mean that _pointed_ values are not saved (i.e. the target > objects not serialized), or that even the raw value (i.e. the pointer > or the primitive type value) is shared ? > > Sylvain > There's no serialization involved in creating or invoking a continuation. And, yes, all local variables are shared (whether "primitive" or not). Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org