Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4069 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 01:05:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2003 01:05:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 90864 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2003 01:04:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 90836 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2003 01:04:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 90807 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 01:04:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host.leverageweb.com) (64.91.232.157) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2003 01:04:44 -0000 Received: from va-leesburg-cmts5c-93.chvlva.adelphia.net ([67.21.159.93] helo=leverageweb.com) by host.leverageweb.com with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19sBA6-0002Hm-00 for users@cocoon.apache.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:01:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3F4D5B02.4060200@leverageweb.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:29:38 -0400 From: Geoff Howard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: [proposal] Production Build Target (was Re: Products in the Build directory?) References: <20030827183151.4245.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030827183151.4245.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.leverageweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cocoon.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - leverageweb.com X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Timothy Larson wrote: > --- Geoff Howard wrote: > ... > >>Can you all agree on which options should define a "production build"? >> >>Geoff > > I don't know. Lets try! > > I suggest that a baseline production build should: > > Include all components, even scratchpad and deprecated I'd disagree. In a production app, I don't want scratchpad or deprecated. And because extra components can have performance implications, I want only the components I'll use. (and I do this my self now with a pair of local.xxx.properties) > Exclude all samples Agreed. > Exclude all documentation Agreed (from the webapp) > Have an empty section in sitemap Ok. > Be easy to specify includes and excludes starting > from this baseline configuration. Includes and excludes of what? If blocks, it doesn't get any easier (at the moment) than editing a local.blocks.properties. If the things we just discussed above, this already exists in the first 10 lines or so of [local.]build.properties. > Anybody who is interested, please speak up > with your agreement, differences, etc. This is exactly why I asked. I'll be surprised if people can agree on this. I think there may be an illusion of common requirements which on closer examination will turn out to have mutually exclusive conflicts. If not, I think this can be done easily in very little time. Please, before weighing in, look over build.properties and blocks.properties, along with http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=BuildProperties, INSTALL.txt and http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/installing/index.html#Building+Cocoon Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org