Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030602141856.026f1190@leverageweb.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 14:24:39 -0400
To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
From: Geoff Howard <cocoon@leverageweb.com>
Subject: Re: No valid JdbcConnection class available with MySQL
In-Reply-To: <39A58364-9521-11D7-AD47-000393A32F72@covad.net>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030602074106.00a96228@leverageweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 01:39 PM 6/2/2003, you wrote:
>On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 07:47  AM, Geoff Howard wrote:
>
>>Not even by the name of the jar?  For instance, in 2.0.x for jdk1.4 the 
>>excalibur datasource
>>jar is called excalibur-datasource-vm14-20021121.jar.  The vm14 stands 
>>for "virtual machine version 1.4"  and I think the other is called *vm12*.
>
>You're right. I don't know how I missed that. That's the only one that's 
>different though. Does that mean the rest of the libraries are the same? 
>It would sure have been a lot easier to swap one .jar file than to 
>reinstall Cocoon.

I'm not certain but don't think that it's the only difference.  It should 
be the only different jar in the lib directory - but at various points 
there has been conditional compilation in the cocoon classes 
themselves.  It wasn't always so, and I don't think it's so now (in 2.1 
HEAD).  If you're curious though, I'd love to find out what happens if you 
take that route!

Geoff 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org