cocoon-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Olivier Billard <obill...@rennes.jouve.fr>
Subject Re: Cocoon Build : deprecated block necessary ?
Date Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:28:48 GMT
Ok thanks Geoff

I'll let you know if I get into a clean patch.
Thanks again !


Geoff Howard wrote:

> Well, I think that compiling and running the tests is not optional because
> if something is failing a unit test, you'd want to know.  However, the 
> present
> problem is not a real problem but a fake one!  My understanding is that
> it's just a problem of the real package having moved without its tests.
> 
> If you get a chance to look into where these things should go, let me know.
> Someone will be looking at it - perhaps even me - eventually.  It's going
> to get more important once beta stage hits real soon now.
> 
> For now, if you want to hack out the test stuff, it won't cause harm.  You
> could also remove the specific offending tests (I don't even know which 
> ones they are) and leave the depends target alone.
> 
> Geoff
> 
> At 09:31 AM 6/23/2003, you wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for your answer Geoff !
>>
>> By "squeeze", I thought "brutaly delete the compile-tests depends 
>> clause in the compile targer", to avoid the problem. As I didn't get 
>> deep into this tests, I don't know what could depend on this.
>> But why is "compile-tests" not optional, as "compile-deprecated" ? No 
>> need for this ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance...
>>
>>
>> Geoff Howard wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure what you mean by squeeze the depends clause, but the root
>>> problem needs to get fixed.  It either means removing the tests for
>>> deprecated items, or modifying the build to exclude deprecated tests
>>> when deprecated is excluded (which means creating a deprecated test
>>> directory somewhere and moving the offending items there) or, moving
>>> the deprecated tests to their new home (because IIRC, the items have
>>> not been truly deprecated but moved to excalibur??)
>>>
>>> Patches or specific suggestions will be very welcome.
>>>
>>> Geoff
>>>
>>> At 08:31 AM 6/23/2003, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to build a mini-clean webapp, but the "compile-tests" 
>>>> target seems to depend on deprecated stuffs, as said in the comment 
>>>> of the build file.
>>>> What is the cleanest solution ? Is this target necessary to build 
>>>> the webapp, or not ?
>>>> Can I squeeze the depends clause of "compile" target ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance !
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Olivier Billard
>>>> Jouve SI
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org
> 
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message