cocoon-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ali Mesbah <...@West.NL>
Subject Re: internal pipeline
Date Thu, 05 Jun 2003 10:12:48 GMT
Andreas,

As quoted from Andreas Hartmann <andreas@apache.org>:
> Hi Ali,
> 
> Ali Mesbah wrote:
> 
> >Hi all,
> >I have a problem and don't know if it is a bug in Cocoon or if I'm doing
> >something wrong. 
> >
> >What I have is a pipeline which transforms an XML (source) file into an 
> >XSLT
> >(target) stylesheet:
> >
> ><map:match pattern="xms/test">
> >  <map:generate src="xms/resources/combined.xml"/>
> >  <map:transform src="xms/styles/Meta_output.xsl"/>
> >  <map:serialize type="xml"/>
> ></map:match>
> >
> >
> >now I'd like to use the output as the source of another pipeline:
> >
> ><map:match pattern="view/*">
> >  <map:generate src="xms/resources/{1}.xml"/>
> >  <map:transform src="cocoon:/xms/test"/>
> >  <map:serialize type="html"/>
> ></map:match>
> >
> >
> >I don't get any errors but the HTML output of the "view" pipeline is not 
> >the
> >expected (I have checked the output of the first pipeline and that is 
> >correct. I
> >assume it has something to do with the way I use "cocoon:/..." as the 
> >source of
> >the second transformer). Any ideas?
> 
> Your pipelines look OK (if I didn't miss anything). You're using
> the cocoon: protocol correctly. I also tried this kind of "stylesheet
> generation" (using XSP) and it worked very well. So I guess your
> problem is somewhere in the last transformation step.
> 
> You can try to set the log level to DEBUG and look at the sitemap
> log to see if the correct steps are executed.

No. There is a major difference between the log information when the "xms/test"
pipeline is called directly and when it is called by the second pipeline through
the Cocoon: protocol. 
I even added a LOG Transformer after the first pipeline; when using Cocoon:
protocol, this log file remains empty:
([setup] ---------------------------- [Thu Jun 05 11:59:01 CEST 2003] ------)

while when called directly it is filled by all the right steps.

> The next debugging step could be to save the output of your first
> pipeline as an XSLT file and to use this directly without the
> cocoon: protocol.

Did that too. And indeed when I save the output of the first pipeline and use it
as a normal source for the second (view) pipeline it goes as wished. 

So I think my assumption was correct that it has to do with the use of the
Cocoon: protocol as the src of a transformer. Have you ever by the way used it in
this way too (Cocoon: as the src of XSLT (not XSP) via pipelines)? 

> HTH,
> Andreas

-- 
-- Ali Mesbah, West Consulting B.V., www.west.nl, +31 15 2191600

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message