Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-users-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 50243 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2003 12:31:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 50216 invoked from network); 14 May 2003 12:31:24 -0000 Received: from out001pub.verizon.net (HELO out001.verizon.net) (206.46.170.140) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2003 12:31:24 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([141.156.213.191]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030514123124.DJSB12592.out001.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 07:31:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3EC2371A.2060103@verizon.net> Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 08:31:22 -0400 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: dynamic xsp compiled only once References: <3EC03377.4070707@verizon.net> <20030512154908.967125D716@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com> <20030512154908.967125D716@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com> <5.2.1.1.0.20030512175653.00ab58f0@sirius.gsi.fr> <3EC03377.4070707@verizon.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20030514102358.00ae9a48@sirius.gsi.fr> In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20030514102358.00ae9a48@sirius.gsi.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [141.156.213.191] at Wed, 14 May 2003 07:31:24 -0500 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Alexandre Victoor wrote: > >> >> >> Minor correction: sample which should compile XSP just once is >> http://localhost:8888/samples/sources/xsp-cocoon. xsp-dynamic should >> get compiled on every request. >> >> Vadim >> > > Hi again > I have tried the example and it gets recompiled at each request :( I > have tried with cocoon-2.0.4 and cocoon-latest. > Is there an older version of cocoon working better ? Works ok with 2.0.5-dev, I just verified it. Does not work with 2.1m1 - as I said, there is some bug there. Don't know about 2.0.4, but it supposed to be working there too. Vadim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org