Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-users-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 11220 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2003 17:57:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 11206 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2003 17:57:27 -0000 Received: from ns1.solarwinds.com (64.114.167.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2003 17:57:27 -0000 Received: from jd (h24-79-185-58.nb.shawcable.net [24.79.185.58]) by ns1.solarwinds.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h3CHvPJM001942 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:57:26 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <008701c30125$43cea620$5901a8c0@jd> From: "JD Daniels" To: References: <5B093C49F2649B459246944825A267AB0162C958@sxmbx03.corproot.net> <001801c3011a$615c4400$5901a8c0@jd> <3E984770.4040108@dotech.com> Subject: Re: XMLForm Question Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:56:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0084_01C300E2.31BC78B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01C300E2.31BC78B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, I guess I should have mentioned that I did in fact delete my tomcat = work directory, shutdown and startup. It did not make a difference... = hence my frustration :) I know that when I get this crap figured out, I will never hack php = again :D The trick is getting it figured heh heh. JD ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David Kavanagh=20 To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org=20 Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 9:05 AM Subject: Re: XMLForm Question I think you just need to restart the container (in your case, tomcat). = In theory, Tomcat use an adaptive classloader that you can configure (in = server.xml) to reload classes when they change. I was able to use this = feature when my web app was simple. Once I started having more statefull = information in memory, I really needed to restart the whole app (and = tomcat) when I changed my code.=20 BTW, If you were to use JBoss/Jetty, you should be able to take = advantage of the JBoss hot-deploy feature. The idea being if you touch = the web.xml under cocoon, jboss should redeploy the app, and pick up = your code change. At this point, JBoss exits when I try this. I'm sure = I'm doing something wrong. David JD Daniels wrote: Thanks for the answer Sylvain.... That was what I had thought... after I restarted my machine, it all = started working. ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01C300E2.31BC78B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, I guess I should have mentioned = that I did in=20 fact delete my tomcat work directory, shutdown and startup. It did not = make a=20 difference... hence my frustration :)
 
I know that when I get this crap = figured out, I=20 will never hack php again :D The trick is getting it figured heh=20 heh.
 
JD
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 David = Kavanagh
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 = 9:05=20 AM
Subject: Re: XMLForm = Question

I think you just need to restart the = container (in=20 your case, tomcat). In theory, Tomcat use an adaptive classloader that = you can=20 configure (in server.xml) to reload classes when they change. I was = able to=20 use this feature when my web app was simple. Once I started having = more=20 statefull information in memory, I really needed to restart the whole = app (and=20 tomcat) when I changed my code.
BTW, If you were to use = JBoss/Jetty, you=20 should be able to take advantage of the JBoss hot-deploy feature. The = idea=20 being if you touch the web.xml under cocoon, jboss should redeploy the = app,=20 and pick up your code change. At this point, JBoss exits when I try = this. I'm=20 sure I'm doing something wrong.

David

JD Daniels = wrote:
Thanks for the answer Sylvain....

That was what I had thought... after I restarted my machine, it all =
started
working.
------=_NextPart_000_0084_01C300E2.31BC78B0--