cocoon-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geoff Howard" <coc...@leverageweb.com>
Subject RE: Interesting use of map:mount
Date Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:01:25 GMT
Not sure what part you were concerned about, but I have been using 
empty uri-prefix for my setup with no problems.  I am doing some 
virtual host-type things with cocoon, so I have host matchers/selectors
in my main sitemap with patterns like *.mydomain.com that mount their 
particular application with an empty uri-prefix.

Geoff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Hoegg [mailto:rhoegg@isisnetworks.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:43 PM
> To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Interesting use of map:mount
> 
> 
> Hey all,
> 
> I wanted to run my novel usage of map:mount by you all in case I am 
> breaking some seemingly unwritten rule.
> 
> I have my main sitemap all set up declaring components and such, and 
> then in my pipelines I have this:
> 
>   <map:pipeline>
>     <map:match pattern="**">
>       <map:mount check-reload="yes" src="isis-sitemap.xmap" 
> uri-prefix=""/>
>     </map:match>
>   </map:pipeline>
> 
> Note the uri-prefix.  The idea is that I have a sitemap for my 
> application that defines the actual application sitemap.  I tried it and 
> it works.  Is there some reason I shouldn't be doing this?  All the 
> map:mount docs I can find talk about using this for delegating URI space 
> to other sitemaps.
> 
> --
> Ryan Hoegg
> ISIS Networks
> http://www.isisnetworks.net
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message