cocoon-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hunsberger, Peter" <>
Subject RE: proposal: "The Newbies Competence Center" (XSP?)
Date Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:12:45 GMT
> Thanks for the comments; I am still not sure I 
> understand or agree with the "proprietary" code part; 
> my definition (based around ownership) seemingly disagrees 
> with yours - we will then obviously disagree about the  
> implications... 
For purposes of evaluating information technologies I consider a technology
proprietary if it is only available from a single source (or perhaps a
closed consortium). Eg. an AS/400 is proprietary a PC is not, MS Excel is
proprietary, spreadsheets, in general, are not. 
When a technology happens to be an Open Source project your concerns are
probably less than if the source was an obscure vendor with minimal
revenues.  None-the-less many Open Source initiatives have withered on the
vine in the past.  
As I've also implied, it's not just an issue of long term support;
portability can be an issue. The other issue is the cost of acquisition:
when something is available from multiple sources it there is competition to
drive down prices (not a concern with Open Source) and competition to
include features (including good documentation :-)...
However, all this is just incidental to the reason for my original response:
the fact remains that you don't need XSP to write a major Cocoon

View raw message