Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-users-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 64899 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2002 17:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 64886 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2002 17:51:30 -0000 Message-ID: <601F6322AD71D5118D6C0003472515290660D048@sjmemexc1.stjude.org> From: "Hunsberger, Peter" To: "'cocoon-users@xml.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Empty anchor tags Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:51:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Thanks, it works now. Should follow the specs. Wasn't valid > in HTML 4.0, though? Id is better anyway, it's more generic. It's still valid, from the same document: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.2.1 You can use either name or id, but the name has to be unique. >> > >> >> Whooa, that would be a spec violation, IIRC... :-) >> >> > Called with: >> > >> > link to foo >> > >> > This doesn't work with IE: >> > >> > >> > Unless I missed something I don't think there is an obvious reason one should work and the other not work... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: