Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-users-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 46570 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2002 12:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 46558 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2002 12:46:29 -0000 From: "Leigh Dodds" To: Subject: RE: Relax NG validation for Cocoon Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:44:09 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <1029398501.1406.7487.camel@ighp> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > - also relaxng has no way for docs to identify schema, any ideas? > > In my experiments, Jing is told on the command-line which > *.rng to use against a particular doc.xml, i.e. the declaration > is external to the xml instance. Thats by design. James Clark purposefully decided that identifying how a schema gets associated with an instance document is outside the scope of RELAX NG. So its up to the implementation. This actually makes a lot of sense, because if you think it through there are many different ways in which one might want to associate a schema with a particular document. Cheers, L. -- Leigh Dodds Weblog: http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic Home: http://www.ldodds.com Current Project: http://outerthought.net/wiki/Wiki.jsp "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" -- William of Ockham --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: