Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-users-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 22455 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2002 21:31:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 22444 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2002 21:31:08 -0000 Message-ID: <111CCE21E90FD511A7BE0002B325AFDEEC1761@MAIL> From: Argyn Kuketayev To: "'cocoon-users@xml.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Stream generator & XMLForms Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:31:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: ouzo@kompuart.pl [mailto:ouzo@kompuart.pl] > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 1:08 PM > To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org > Subject: Re: Stream generator & XMLForms > > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 11:23:56AM -0500, Ivelin Ivanov wrote: > > > > Tell us more about the problem you're trying to solve. > > What type of content you want to send in and return back. > > > > Can you you consider using HTTP GET parameters to submit to > Cocoon, instead > > of XML? > > This will allow you to use XMLForm, etc. > I am writing an application for Pocket PC for company's > mobile representatives > I don't think I can use GET parameter because of the size of > data (whole > invoice for example - I do not want to collect is > sequentially in session > object because it's more complicated) recently, I was trying to find the size limit for parameters passed with GET request. I found only that IE has ~2k (or 4k?) limit, but it seems to me that W3C doesn't set any particular limits. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: