Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-users-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 27669 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2002 01:42:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 27657 invoked from network); 16 May 2002 01:42:54 -0000 Message-ID: <3CE30F65.6040206@reanimality.com> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 18:46:13 -0700 From: Marc Jeffrey Driftmeyer Reply-To: mjd@reanimality.com Organization: ReAnimality Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.0.4b3 and Cocoon 2.1-dev play nicely References: <20020515213414.177850b6.frank.ridderbusch@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N So long as you are running a non-SDK 1.4 of Java. -Marc Frank Ridderbusch wrote: >Just to let you know. I just grabbed Tomcat 4.0.4b3 and did a quick >'cp -rp' install of Cocoon (a recent 2.1-dev) from my older Tomcat. >JDK is IBM 1.3.1. > >As far as I can tell from my random clicks through documentation and >samples and my own pages, Tomcat and Cocoon work just nicely together. > >I think, 4.0.4b3 feels a little faster than 4.0.1, but I'm not sure. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: