cocoon-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Luca Morandini" <l.mo...@tin.it>
Subject RE: esql Vs SQLTransformer
Date Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:48:36 GMT
Valentin,

I don't think SQL Transformer is deprecated, since it was patched in the
very latest version of Cocoon.

Moreover, such a fine piece of software (which includes painless stored
procedure support), has no reason to be deprecated.

Best regards,

---------------------------------------------
               Luca Morandini
               GIS Consultant
              lmorandini@ieee.org
http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
---------------------------------------------


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Valentin.Chartier@Spatial.com
> [mailto:Valentin.Chartier@Spatial.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 3:00 AM
> To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: esql Vs SQLTransformer
>
>
>
> I also share your impression that the SQL transformer is better : I would
> like to start using cocoon by processing my html pages (designed with an
> html editor like Dreamweaver) with cocoon to replace some tags of my own
> with the result of database queries. It seems I could use the SQL
> transformer after the HTML generator. But I can not see how I
> could use the
> esql logicsheet to do the same.
>
> I think that I read somewhere (although I am not able to  find it again)
> that the SQL transformer was deprecated.
>
> Valentin
>
>
>
>
>
>                     "Miller, Grant"
>
>                     <Grant.Miller@C        To:
> "'cocoon-users@xml.apache.org'" <cocoon-users@xml.apache.org>
>                     OGNOS.com>             cc:
>
>                                            Subject:     esql Vs
> SQLTransformer
>                     01/18/2002
>
>                     07:34 AM
>
>                     Please respond
>
>                     to cocoon-users
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
> Can anyone explain what are the advantages/disadvantages of using the esql
> logicsheet as compared to the SQL transformer?
> At the moment it seems to me that SQL transformer is better
> because you can
> chain arbitrary sql transformers together where as esql can only
> be done in
> the generate step. In other words, why have esql at all?
> Are there other issues, such as does SQL transformer use connection
> pooling?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Grant
>
> This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information.  If
> you
> have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you
> may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any
> attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender
> promptly by e-mail that you have done so.  Thank you.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message