Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-users-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 34374 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2001 18:04:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 34297 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 18:04:02 -0000 Message-ID: <3B6EDE13.BB99CDF8@orionsci.com> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 14:12:35 -0400 From: rajkumar@orionsci.com (Rajkumar, Joseph) Organization: Orion Scientific Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-users Subject: C1 vs C2 - Speed and Stability Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Folks I have Apache-1.3.20+Tomcat-3.2.2+Cocoon-1.8.2 running in a production system. I do realise that Cocoon-1 is not in development any more and that Cocoon2-Beta2 is available. I do run across xml files that take quite a while to display ie in the order of 1 to 2 minutes. These are large xml files though. My question is: Will I be able to realise any significant performance improvements if I switch from C1 to C2 using the same Apache+Tomcat (3.2.2 or 3.2.3). We are a little concerned about shipping Cocoon2-beta2 but I would not mind if there is significant performance increases. Any opinions and thoughts on why I should switch over to Cocoon2 or why I should wait for a final release of Cocoon2 would be greatly appreciated. Regards Joseph Rajkumar --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: