Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <906987C05D86D4119F0E0000D1106EC46187@BLAHFASEL>
From: Henning von Bargen <H.vonBargen@Triestram-Partner.de>
To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
Subject: AW: XML and FLASH?
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 08:50:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This "saxess" FO library is nice.
Until SVG viewer plugins are more or less installed in every browser,
it seems like a reasonable alternative to the SVG->bitmap renderer on =
the
server side.
I don't like the idea of converting SVG to bitmaps on the server =
because
many of
the features of SVG are lost then.=20
Instead one should encourage users to install a SVG viewer plugin.
The Adobe SVG viewer is working well for me, it's only a bit slow.
SVG viewer plugins are tomorrow.
For today, IMHO using saxess and shockwave flash plugin on the client =
side
is=20
better than using SVG with bitmap rendering on the server side, because
a) shockwave plugin is available for most browsers
b) shockwave plugin is fast and stable
c) shockwave files are usually small in size.
d) shockwave files are interactive.
The same is true for SVG and SMIL iff they are rendered on the client =
side.
Henning

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:	Marcelo F. Ochoa [SMTP:mochoa@ieee.org]
> Gesendet am:	Montag, 11. September 2000 22:09
> An:	cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
> Betreff:	Re: XML and FLASH?
>=20
> luis fraga wrote:
>=20
> > Can all these technologies(XML and stylesheets) mix with macromedia
FLASH?
> > Is Flash code or binary driven?
>=20
>  Check at:http://195.14.236.181/wave/
>=20
> > Thanks for the atention!
> >
> > =
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org
>=20
>   Regards, Marcelo. << Datei: Card for Marcelo Ochoa >>  << Datei:
ATT00197.txt >>=20