Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 36098 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2000 07:35:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhost.experian.co.uk) (194.60.170.33) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2000 07:35:45 -0000 Received: from experian.com (unverified) by mailhost.experian.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:34:08 +0100 Received: from UKNOTDT-Message_Server by experian.com with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:34:16 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:33:17 +0000 From: John Morrison To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Subject: RE: stupid question about xsl:include/import -Reply Sorry Donald, I said that xinclude worked for both files and URL absolute and relative, not that xsl:include did. >>> Donald Ball 10/July/2000 08:03pm >>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Paulo Gaspar wrote: > I know nothing but... to me it seems that: > 1. "file:" would always have to be related to the server's local file > system; > 2. "http:" is the thing that would give you a web related link. In this > case > a web related relative link (oops!). Should be something like: > "http:/common.xsl" that's not a valid URL. to be fair, this is sort of a gray area, since the page exists in two contexts (as you allude to above) - filespace and urispace. one would expect, however, that relative urls in xsl:include/import would be relative to the page in urispace, not filespace. - donald --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org