cocoon-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Ball <>
Subject RE: stupid question about xsl:include/import
Date Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:03:15 GMT
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Paulo Gaspar wrote:

> I know nothing but... to me it seems that:
>   1. "file:" would always have to be related to the server's local file
> system;
>   2. "http:" is the thing that would give you a web related link. In this
> case
>      a web related relative link (oops!). Should be something like:
>         "http:/common.xsl"

that's not a valid URL. to be fair, this is sort of a gray area, since the
page exists in two contexts (as you allude to above) - filespace and
urispace. one would expect, however, that relative urls in
xsl:include/import would be relative to the page in urispace, not

- donald

View raw message