cocoon-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo.gas...@krankikom.de>
Subject RE: stupid question about xsl:include/import
Date Tue, 11 Jul 2000 11:25:58 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Ball [mailto:balld@webslingerZ.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 10:03
> 
> 
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> 
> > I know nothing but... to me it seems that:
> >   1. "file:" would always have to be related to the server's local file
> > system;
> >   2. "http:" is the thing that would give you a web related 
> link. In this
> > case
> >      a web related relative link (oops!). Should be something like:
> >         "http:/common.xsl"
> 
> that's not a valid URL. 

OOPS!!!!
I missed a damn slash!!!
=:o|

> to be fair, this is sort of a gray area, since the
> page exists in two contexts (as you allude to above) - filespace and
> urispace. one would expect, however, that relative urls in
> xsl:include/import would be relative to the page in urispace, not
> filespace.

Donald, how the hell does one know where is the root of "file:"
urispace? How would you then relate it with a virtual path?

Just courious. urispace is too abstract without undersanging this.


Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar


Mime
View raw message