Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 14205 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2000 22:11:20 -0000 Received: from systemy.systemy.it (194.20.140.20) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jun 2000 22:11:20 -0000 Received: from apache.org (pv41-pri.systemy.it [194.21.255.41]) by systemy.systemy.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA28569 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:11:14 GMT Message-ID: <395BC619.88BF48A3@apache.org> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:56:41 +0200 From: Stefano Mazzocchi Organization: Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; I) X-Accept-Language: en,it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: URL Encoding References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Donald Ball wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Ulrich Mayring wrote: > > > In fact, what I meant was that I think it's cool that people begin to > > realize there needs to be a standard way to interface between data and > > logic. The focus here is on STANDARD. > > > > When we look at the classic techniques (ASP, ColdFusion, PHP etc.), then > > we find that logic we write in one system cannot be transferred to > > another. This problem needs to be solved on several levels. First, there > > is the programming language level, we have a workable solution here with > > Java. Then there is the data level, we have a pretty good solution here > > with XML. And then, finally, there are a number of "dirty" levels like > > middleware, Application Servers, Web Servers etc. These levels cannot be > > defined rigorously, every business/organisation has different products > > and needs. I call this the workflow level - not much work has been done > > in that area, except perhaps for the invention of buzzwords like EAI. > > So, coming back to what I thought was cool: > > > > If, say, the W3C were to define a standard way to interface between XML > > and logic (Java, ...), then we really could build taglibs and give them > > to other people, who don't use cocoon. Perhaps some folks want to use > > Enhydra or some wicked Perl script - but the add-on work they do is > > lost. I don't know if this standard interface I am hoping for is > > something like SOAP or if it is XSLT extensions or perhaps even XSP. I > > merely claim that work in this area is cool and needed. > > that's a big ol' fatty +1 from me. however, i'm oddly inclined to be > conservative and say that it's too early still - we need to try things > like XSP and axkit's xpathscript and xslt extensions and whatever else > people come up with and see what the pros and cons of the various > approaches are before jumping into the standardization game. Amen. -- Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. Friedrich Nietzsche -------------------------------------------------------------------- Missed us in Orlando? Make it up with ApacheCON Europe in London! ------------------------- http://ApacheCon.Com ---------------------