Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-fr-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1716 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2006 07:04:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2006 07:04:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 84489 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2006 12:52:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-fr-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users-fr@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users-fr@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 84457 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2006 12:52:46 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:52:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of guillaume.helle@capgemini.com designates 194.3.247.82 as permitted sender) Received: from [194.3.247.82] (HELO mxepar01.capgemini.com) (194.3.247.82) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:52:32 -0700 Received: from mxipar01.capgemini.com (prvmta2 [194.3.224.82]) by mxepar01.capgemini.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9PCq8Je004572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:52:08 +0200 (MEST) Received: from prvmta2.capgemini.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxipar01.capgemini.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9PCq8jo003758 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:52:08 +0200 (MEST) Received: from pasteur2.capgemini.fr (smtp.capgemini.fr [10.67.1.90]) by prvmta2.capgemini.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9PCq8v7003744 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:52:08 +0200 (MEST) Received: from pasteur.capgemini.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pasteur2.capgemini.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k9PCq6Q8020177 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:52:06 +0200 (MEST) Received: from L0853 ([10.67.208.30]) by pasteur.capgemini.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k9PCq4mD020137 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:52:04 +0200 (MEST) From: "HELLE Guillaume" To: Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mont=E9e_en_charge_:_loadbalancing_ou_clustering=3F?= Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:52:05 +0200 Message-ID: <009001c6f834$5fbabfe0$1ed0430a@sud.capgemini.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: AcbvnCw8hJCBSnmvQ6GICom0+l0A3gC+ZPmQAWbDOFA= In-Reply-To: <8A60B10D94E5C843A670E3B3835C96BE8B4928@CRBSMXSUSR03> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bonjour, nous avons actuellement une appli Cocoon qui tourne sous Tomcat 4=2Ex avec moins d'une centaine d'utilisateurs simultan=E9s=2E Le succ=E8s fait que nous allons passer =E0 500 users simultan=E9s=2E=2E=2E On se demande donc, sachant qu'il s'agit d'une appli Cocoon Forms "classique" : - si on peut faire du loadbalancing ou s'il faut passer en cluster, - si l'on reste en tomcat 4=2Ex ou si l'on passe en tomcat 5=2E5 ou en= Websphere =2E=2E=2E=2E Quelqu'un a-t-il d=E9j=E0 eu ce genre de probl=E9matique avec Cocoon? Merci pour vos avis =E9clair=E9s! Amicalement, Guillaume Helle This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential= and is the property of the Capgemini Group=2E It is intended only for the= person to whom it is addressed=2E If you are not the intended recipient, = you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, = distribute, or use this message or any part thereof=2E If you receive this= message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all = copies of this message=2E --------------------------------------------------------------------- Liste francophone Apache Cocoon -- http://cocoon.apache.org/fr/ Pour vous desinscrire : mailto:users-fr-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org Autres commandes : mailto:users-fr-help@cocoon.apache.org