Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36153 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 12:00:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 12:00:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 67828 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2004 12:00:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-docs-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 67635 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2004 12:00:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: docs@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list docs@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 67577 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2004 12:00:12 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [157.193.121.51] (HELO otsrv1.iic.ugent.be) (157.193.121.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 05:00:11 -0700 Received: from otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i61B06v08003 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:00:06 +0200 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:00:06 +0200 Message-Id: <200407011100.i61B06v08003@otsrv1.iic.ugent.be> From: stevenn@outerthought.org To: docs@cocoon.apache.org Subject: [WIKI-UPDATE] WoodyScratchpad Thu Jul 1 13:00:06 2004 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Page: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=WoodyScratchpad , version: 25 on Wed Jul 1 10:44:02 2004 by JoergHeinicke - *Instead of using an empty "id" attribute should we use as the default case? (+1 tim, +1 mpo) + *Instead of using an empty "id" attribute should we use as the default case? (+1 tim, +1 mpo, +1 jh) ? +++++++ - *What should we do if the expression evaluates to the default anyway? (mpo: seems more logic in the when@test/otherwise filosophy?) (tim: I do not understand; could you clarify your comment?) + *What should we do if the expression evaluates to the default anyway? (''mpo: seems more logic in the when@test/otherwise filosophy?'') (''tim: I do not understand; could you clarify your comment?'') ? ++ ++ ++ ++ - *What namespace should the widget id's be in? (''mpo: supposing you refer to namespacing with respect to generated request-parameter names, right?'') (''tim: yes'') + *What namespace (read: generated request parameter names) should the widget id's be in? - **widget-id -- Same as widgets outside the choice. (+1 tim, +1 mpo) + **widget-id -- Same as widgets outside the choice. (+1 tim, +1 mpo, +1 jh) ? +++++++ - **choice-id.widget-id -- wrapped by the choice's namespace. (-0 tim) + **choice-id.widget-id -- wrapped by the choice's namespace. (-0 tim, +0 jh) ? +++++++ - **case-id.widget-id -- wrapped by th case's namespace. (-0 tim, -1 mpo, see below) + **case-id.widget-id -- wrapped by th case's namespace. (-0 tim, -1 mpo, see below, -1 jh) ? +++++++ - **choice-id.case-id.widget-id -- wrapped by the choice's and the case's namespaces. (-1 tim, -1 mpo since the cases are exclusive) + **choice-id.case-id.widget-id -- wrapped by the choice's and the case's namespaces. (-1 tim, -1 mpo since the cases are exclusive, -1 jh) ? +++++++ - + - + - A mask is similar to a "case" from the "choice/case" proposal + A mask is similar to a "case" from the "choice/case" proposal above ? ++++++ - at: http-link-to-wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=WoodyScratchpad - simple setters and getters are all encoded into an xml format. ? ^^^ + simple setters and getters are all encoded into an XML format. ? ^^^ - We can create a simplified xml format for these action masks, ? ^^^ + We can create a simplified XML format for these action masks, ? ^^^ - dynamically from Java or javascript. ? ^ + dynamically from Java or Javascript. ? ^