Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-docs-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 20378 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2003 11:14:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-docs-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 20348 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 11:14:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host.leverageweb.com) (64.91.232.157) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 11:14:37 -0000 Received: from dhcp205162.hq.af.mil ([134.205.205.162] helo=WHEW00073U.leverageweb.com) by host.leverageweb.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19Rrtc-0006pR-00 for cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:11:32 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030616071120.00aa6530@leverageweb.com> X-Sender: cocoon@leverageweb.com@leverageweb.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:13:07 -0400 To: cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org From: Geoff Howard Subject: Re: [RT] Moving committer infos and news In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.leverageweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - xml.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - leverageweb.com X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Totally agree on both. There are other things that should either be moved or at least added in both places - the link to the lists, for example. Geoff At 03:48 AM 6/16/2003, you wrote: >Small RT for today: > >I think we should move the news section from the cocoon-2.0 and >cocoon-2.1 site to the "global" cocoon-site module and remove >them in cocoon-2.0 and cocoon-2.1. So we have one single place >for news. (The news section on the main site is already available). > >In addition I propose to also move the committer infos to >cocoon-site, so we have one single place for the committer infos. >We could put there our images etc and this would not increase >the size of our distributions as the cocoon-site is not >contained in the dists. > >What do you think? > >Carsten