cocoon-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Morrison, John" <>
Subject RE: Back to home-grown docs? (Re: [RT] New Target: sub-sitemap)
Date Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:20:26 GMT
Jeff Turner wrote:
> Off in RT mode a bit..
> Every time I upgrade Forrest's jars, I think that Forrest should
> really just be a Cocoon block.  Despite its 20mb, there really isn't
> that much _content_ in Forrest.  A sitemap, some DTDs, a couple of
> skins, and an Ant-driven build process. 
> That the 'core' of Forrest is so small leads me to wonder if Cocoon
> shouldn't just include what it needs of Forrest internally. That would
> be:
> The forrest-css skin:  128k
> The v12 or v20a DTD :  31k
> A bunch of sitemaps :  124k
> Image resources     :  20k
> Stylesheet resources:  131k
> resolver.jar (ant)  :  68k
>                        -----
>                        502k
> Most Forrest developers are also Cocoon developers, so I suspect the
> cost of keeping these in synch is lower than the cost to Cocoon
> developers of having to deal with Forrest as a separate entity.
> The result would be that Cocoon eliminates a dependency, and Forrest
> gains a bunch of indirect contributors, as improvements to the Cocoon
> doc system get fed back into Forrest.  Plus (and this is the bit that
> appeals to me) any Cocoon breakage that affects Forrest will be
> Cocoon's problem before it becomes Forrest's ;)
> Practically, this amounts to:
> 1) In Cocoon's existing src/documentation/* doc system, synchronize
>    stylesheets, DTDs and images with Forrest's.
> 2) If everything works, call a vote on cocoon-docs to remove the
>    Forrest Ant targets, and use the built-in system.
> What do people think?

Personally, I'd like Forrest to be a block; but I didn't think
Cocoons' block infrastructure was up to the task, yet...


Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.
Experian Limited (registration number 653331).
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF

View raw message