Return-Path: 
 <cocoon-docs-return-315-apmail-xml-cocoon-docs-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-docs-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66024 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2002 08:38:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-docs-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:cocoon-docs-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:cocoon-docs-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66012 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2002 08:38:56 -0000
Received: from tartarus.telenet-ops.be (195.130.132.34)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Dec 2002 08:38:56 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by tartarus.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id E40F6DBA1C
	for <cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:39:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from outerthought.org (D5E00A87.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.10.135])
	by tartarus.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E0FDC7AF
	for <cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:39:08 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <3E1157AC.9020001@outerthought.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:39:08 +0100
From: Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org>
Organization: Outerthought
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cocoon-docs@xml.apache.org
Subject: Out of which branch should the website be published?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hm.

David was looking off-list into some issues with the website, and I was 
trying to help.

Currently, I have a check-out of:

  - cocoon_2_0_3 branch
  - cocoon_2_0_4 branch
  - HEAD

on my machine, but I fail to see how we can consistently decide which 
branch (or HEAD) should go on the public website.

  - news.xml of the HEAD branch contains relevant info
  - some docs in the HEAD branch are not pertinent for the public 
website (non-release-version docs)
  - what about the 2_0_3/2_0_4 branch?
    - 2_0_4 contains recent changes (at least from Sylvain)
    - 2_0_3 has been the focal point of David's efforts lately

Maybe all this might become more clear if we

  - isolate docs into their own CVS module (yes, I know this has been 
suggested before - I believe the complexity and volume of Cocoon doco 
warrants this, and requires some dedication to sort out where to commit 
what)
  - maintain a branch LIVE_WEBSITE over there?

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at              http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org