cocoon-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Noels <stev...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: Out of which branch should the website be published?
Date Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:05:04 GMT
Steven Noels wrote:

> Currently, I have a check-out of:
> 
>  - cocoon_2_0_3_branch
>  - cocoon_2_0_4 tagged files (not a branch!)
                   ^^^^^^

>  - HEAD
> 
> on my machine, but I fail to see how we can consistently decide which 
> branch (or HEAD) should go on the public website.
> 
>  - news.xml of the HEAD branch contains relevant info
>  - some docs in the HEAD branch are not pertinent for the public website 
> (non-release-version docs)
>  - what about the 2_0_3/2_0_4 branch?
>    - 2_0_4 contains recent changes (at least from Sylvain)

wrong

>    - 2_0_3 has been the focal point of David's efforts lately

no branch has been created after the 2.0.4 release

> Maybe all this might become more clear if we
> 
>  - isolate docs into their own CVS module (yes, I know this has been 
> suggested before - I believe the complexity and volume of Cocoon doco 
> warrants this, and requires some dedication to sort out where to commit 
> what)
>  - maintain a branch LIVE_WEBSITE over there?
> 
> </Steven>

My bad,

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at              http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org


Mime
View raw message