That's a good question, thought you already had that more-or-less from the last time this got discussed?
@Francesco: no objections from my side, +1
@Peter: why do we have the proceed a vote? Isn't lazy consensus enough
for that situation? TIA!!!
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Peter Hunsberger
> Makes sense from what I understand of the issue. I think you should just
> take a vote...
> Peter Hunsberger
> 2012/4/9 Francesco Chicchiriccò <email@example.com>
>> HI all,
>> a while ago  we discussed (and almost agreed) a new structure for our
>> SVN, even though we haven't yet been able to agree on a schedule for
>> performing all related activities.
>> A part of  was about moving some modules, used by both C2.2 and C3, to
>> an independent place.
>> Recently I also proposed to apply some pending changes to some of such
>> modules (cocoon-xml, cocoon-servlet-service, ...).
>> Hence, I would like to move modules under ,  and  under a new
>> directory , create separate trunk, branches and tags subdirs, and modify
>> POMs in order to make each module independent.
>> Do you see any issue with this?
>>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/subprojects/
>>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/tools/
>>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/subprojects/
>> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>> Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member