Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of simone.tripodi@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: simone.tripodi@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPFNckhR7crYgmEFdkaMZ5x4KTwAO4cu3Dxf8TFrg5CTgO9HLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPFNckhR7crYgmEFdkaMZ5x4KTwAO4cu3Dxf8TFrg5CTgO9HLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:54:19 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAAqLGLMpsJn5eEN7-=d0NOicYQS0RYoAWAxpGB6ady9uwLmfJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cocoon3] why setup()?
From: Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org>
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi mate,

IIRC, but I could be wrong, the reason is more historical than real
need, to make APIs elastic enough for both Sitemap/programmatic
executions.

Anyway, there are still some things I contine getting confused about
the APIs, but I'll discuss them in a separated thread.

Thanks a lot for the feedbacks, all the best!
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Christian Grobmeier
<grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I was looking at cocoon3 Pipeline interface. I saw:
>
> setup(OutputStream outputStream)
> setup(OutputStream outputStream, Map<String,Object> parameters)
>
> It seem one always needs to call setup() (which makes sense). But why
> is there a method like this? Couldn't it be the execute method which
> takes the OutputStream?
>
> execute(OutputStream outputStream)
> execute(OutputStream outputStream, Map<String,Object> parameters)
>
> One would get rid of setup - this feels more natural to me at first glance.
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de