From dev-return-103334-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Mon Jan 16 20:13:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B779AB22C for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96653 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2012 20:13:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 96590 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2012 20:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 96583 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2012 20:13:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:13:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wolfram.eisert@googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.179] (HELO mail-ey0-f179.google.com) (209.85.215.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:13:24 +0000 Received: by eaao10 with SMTP id o10so1192727eaa.24 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:13:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to :references:message-id:x-mailer; bh=cqdS1kkRFvCu+9F+OK08n8/Ck/up1G3yHmdpTcrXUFo=; b=nA72krEFYGynTwIF7gkINYtXZQaSku76X/mjiUfaQZHkLdspzxhB6kAGnEWbBlOps9 sqfOblsCBVVcUKb5iuNqzWMFKri6k7O3OoxkJCVcrwbLFl9leHxEE0zij/PeqqGtIVhE y5UNtiulVqYVi8Q+1PvNkhIMSFeSTKuP65+c4= Received: by 10.213.31.141 with SMTP id y13mr3335476ebc.85.1326744783347; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:13:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.121] (p57988B13.dip.t-dialin.net. [87.152.139.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm76387851eeu.1.2012.01.16.12.13.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:13:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: Wolfram Eisert From: Wolfram Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7DE4FBDE-54BE-413B-9EA6-9D1860374266" Subject: Re: Porting to current cocoon version Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:12:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: To: dev@cocoon.apache.org References: <4F14275A.6010104@pandora.be> <4F142E7A.6020701@pandora.be> <78B923726E7D59429936580CF127E943A1F58D19F4@eu1rdcrdc1wx032.exi.nxp.com> <05A9F551-301C-46C7-89B4-0300CF8FCEA0@gmail.com> Message-Id: <10DA187C-9F08-4184-8561-69A76097AE32@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) --Apple-Mail=_7DE4FBDE-54BE-413B-9EA6-9D1860374266 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Yes, maybe you are right. But are there major improvements from 2.0.4 to 2.1? One of the main reasons I want to upgrade is to use current version of = Xalan and FOP. Am 16.01.2012 um 18:16 schrieb Peter Hunsberger: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Wolfram = wrote: > It's a 10 year old app with more than 100 XSP's and specialized = tag-librarys depending heavily on the XSP-concept. >=20 > Seems it might be a better fight for 2.1 than 3.0... ?? --Apple-Mail=_7DE4FBDE-54BE-413B-9EA6-9D1860374266 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Yes, maybe you are right.
But are there major improvements from 2.0.4 to 2.1?

One of the main reasons I want to upgrade is to use current version of Xalan and FOP.

Am 16.01.2012 um 18:16 schrieb Peter Hunsberger:

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Wolfram <eisert@philasearch.com> wrote:
It's a 10 year old app with more than 100 XSP's and specialized tag-librarys depending heavily on the XSP-concept.

Seems it might be a better fight for 2.1 than 3.0...  ??

--Apple-Mail=_7DE4FBDE-54BE-413B-9EA6-9D1860374266--