cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lars Huttar <>
Subject Cocoon GetTogether?
Date Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:49:16 GMT
As we've been talking about Cocoon "Do-ocracy" and community
contributions, my mind turns to my past attempts to help develop Cocoon,
and the vast gap that seems to yawn between me and being able to
contribute effectively. While I would love to be able to contribute,
there is quite a stack of technologies that seem to require mastery
first... e.g. Maven, Wicket, Spring...?

I suspect that much of this would be reduced if I could sit down and be
walked through a process with a knowledgeable person who can tell me
what I do and don't need to learn, and of whom I could ask targeted

And that leads me to ask, what are the possibilities of a Cocoon
GetTogether this year? next year?
(The sooner the better, as far as I'm concerned!)

AFAIK the last GT was in 2005? The hackathon sounded very productive.


Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 10:40 -0500, Peter Hunsberger wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Lars Huttar <> wrote:
> I guess my main question is, how reliable is the Cocoon dev team's
> commitment to Cocoon 3.0? How likely are we to see a release version in
> the next 6 months to a year? Will there be bug-fix releases, or will 3.0
> be dropped in favor of another rewrite?
> Hi Lars, a couple of thoughts. I think C2.1 is pretty stable and as
> a result doesn't see a lot of activity. It is however still widely
> used. Personally, I hope to start a C3 project some time in the next
> year or so. Like any Open Source project it's as active and safe as
> the participants make it. If you see it as being attractive you
> should check it out and see to what extent it meets your needs and if
> it doesn't how much work you think it would take to get it where it
> needs to be. I suspect that for the XML pipeline world C3 is still
> more cost / time effective than a lot of other approaches. Also, C3
> seems to be slowly attracting more attention, I don't think it would
> take much to tip it over to being a pretty active project. It
> certainly isn't going anywhere!
> Actually since the end of the last year we at codeBusters are developing
> almost all new projects with c3 and are very happy to do so. ATM our
> main use is based on the REST module but we started as well to migrate
> different "old-school" components to c3 (see e.g. directoryGenerator
> r1142139 on the difference to the old-school one) and have some committs
> still to sync with trunk.

View raw message